Jeff X
Jeff X
Sounds like next step here is a chat with Tim.
> no conflict of interest This is explained in the proposal. I know it is not perfect, but there is some attempt to review the people.
@friedger I agree with the spirit of this. Think you're proposing that subdomains should not be used to get around App Mining rules and/or reviewers. Can you please retitle this...
That sounds like the kind of thing NIL should test, correct?
PBC discussed this. A few problems we see and potential solutions are described below: 1. The code would need to be open source. And would need to be deployed and...
@jasperjansz can you please add more detail to this? Who would review? How would they test? How would scores be generated? How will you prevent gaming? Thx.
@jasperjansz think this may be a good idea, but need more details.
Thx for starting this thread @jehunter5811 I'll address your recommendations first: **1. Commit to this type of App Review** We'll be announcing some reviewer news soon that will mention this...
I'd like to propose we split this into two problems: 1. Simple tracking for app developers 2. Tracking that cannot be gamed and we can use as an app reviewer....
I suggest a dry run to see how many apps this affects and @larrysalibra can you please follow up with specific instructions for how you will test and score.