opensgx
opensgx copied to clipboard
Multithreading
Hello,
Is there multithreading support available in OpenSGX? Where can I find a minimal example of including other libraries, say <pthread.h> into a SGX program?
Hello,the example is simple-openssl.c(/user/test/openssl/),you can read Opensgx_tutorial_v1.pdf for more detail.It says something about using 3rd party libraries in page 9.
Hello, thank you for the comment. However, my first questions remains -- is there support for multithreading in OpenSGX? If so, how can I include pthreads? There is nothing about this in the doc.
Multithreading is not supported currently. It would be good if anyone can contribute. 2016. 4. 21. 오후 11:11에 "Nicolae Paladi" [email protected]님이 작성:
Hello, thank you for the comment. However, my first questions remains -- is there support for multithreading in OpenSGX? If so, how can I include pthreads? There is nothing about this in the doc.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/sslab-gatech/opensgx/issues/34#issuecomment-212936833
thanks for the reply. Are there any ideas about how to implement it and what needs to be done? I might have some time to put into this, but I would need help understanding where to start.
On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:02, Dongsu Han [email protected] wrote:
Multithreading is not supported currently. It would be good if anyone can contribute. 2016. 4. 21. 오후 11:11에 "Nicolae Paladi" [email protected]님이 작성:
Hello, thank you for the comment. However, my first questions remains -- is there support for multithreading in OpenSGX? If so, how can I include pthreads? There is nothing about this in the doc.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/sslab-gatech/opensgx/issues/34#issuecomment-212936833
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/sslab-gatech/opensgx/issues/34#issuecomment-212961206