Simon Shine

@ErikSchierboom: I've written a Haskell solution. Let me know if you'd like to compare them once yours is done or before that. I'm not completely satisfied with mine, so I'd...

Happy holidays then! There's no rush whatsoever.

My solution in Haskell looks [like this](https://gist.github.com/sshine/8eb4e08748cd4aa25526ffdfc3ea1fad). I refrained from doing prime factorization and finding *P = 1* solutions in sub-linear time. I don't know if this is really a...

This function is hard to property test. If instead of returning the number of nonzero coefficients, *P*, it returned a collection of nonzero coefficients, one could verify that there exists...

I've moved the issue to exercism/problem-specifications even though it currently discusses a test idea as being implementable on the F# track in particular. This is because this repo gathers more...

@yawpitch: I wasn't talking about Haskell, I was talking about my willingness. ;-) Aren't anti-conductive and infinitely resistant the same? As for what this means metaphorically for a programming language,...

> I don't see what's wrong with saying that nonequal resistors can have equal resistance I suppose you're right. It depends on whether or not you want to model structural...

> I'm a Masochist, which is also a Monoid. I collect things that are monoids; how are masochists monoidal?

Quick note: In Haskell, one should probably use a GADT or an existentially quantified type rather than using a type class.

@haus wrote: > The algorithm itself isn't very different from isbn 10, but showing how to support both might be a useful endeavor. Good point. My observation is that the...