eesen icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
eesen copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon srvk

Is it possible to use warp-ctc instead?

Open tianshuo opened this issue 9 years ago • 4 comments

The benchmark in https://github.com/baidu-research/warp-ctc is much faster than eesen's implementation.

tianshuo avatar Jan 18 '16 06:01 tianshuo

We are studying the validity of the comparisons they presented, specifically the linear correlation between time and N for Eesen.

yajiemiao avatar Jan 18 '16 15:01 yajiemiao

Parallelization is still an issue for eesen, which needs to be addressed if it is be used massively.

X.

在 2016/1/18 23:37, Yajie Miao 写道:

We are studying the validity of the comparisons they presented, specifically the linear correlation between time and N for Eesen.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/srvk/eesen/issues/28#issuecomment-172563775.

naxingyu avatar Jan 19 '16 00:01 naxingyu

Any news/results about it?

geffy avatar Apr 06 '16 10:04 geffy

We've looked at it, and it does not seem to be that straightforward. Baidu's code is only CTC (no LSTM) so one would need to put a few more things in place before it'll be usable. We also had difficulty understanding the published comparisons. Yajie, I know you're traveling - maybe you could comment some more?

fmetze avatar Apr 12 '16 13:04 fmetze