Simon Rüegg

What do you mean exactly with "default behaviour for the PVCs"? Like defining to not back up PVCs by default (if they don't have the `ignore` annotation set)?

Ok, cool. Yeah I also think that makes sense. Feel free to come up with a pull request, we're happy to support you. I'll see if we can get around...

The idea behind this is that the current default rules are more or less unusable due to too many false positives and as you mentioned different use cases (e.g. hourly...

Yes, exactly. I'm having a hard time to keep up with chart updates, or even noticing them.

Any news on this? We would also very much like to provision RDS instances with this operator.

> [...] I think supporting arbitrary resources would greatly extend the applicability of Crossplane to existing applications where some service is in-cluster and other services are on some of the...

Is there any news on this topic? The issue described in #2150 prevents us currently to use the new "named resources" feature since it breaks with namespaced managed resources.

Might be related: https://github.com/sveltejs/kit/issues/11428

One approach would be to compile each component as a separate [Kapitan target](https://kapitan.dev/inventory/#inventory-targets) with it's own Jsonnet dependencies. This would allow for each component to commit it's lock file in...

It's still the same problem, yes. I think it already is worded properly, with references to #93 ?