Sridhar Ratnakumar
Sridhar Ratnakumar
Another: https://nixos-unified.org/autowiring.html
> Maybe as a flake-module ... Actually, that won't work since the flake containing the flake module doesn't use flake-parts itself.
This would be considered deprecated right? https://flake.parts/options/flake-parts-flakemodules
I'd also suggest dedicating a page or section linking to real-world examples. Here's one: - https://github.com/nix-community/nixd/blob/main/flake.nix
I recently [did some work](https://twitter.com/sridca/status/1763528379188265314) on `haskell-flake` to go from bash to flake checks for its testing story, which led me to wonder about a more general framework for all...
> These were purely data tests, so I thought eval was fine. Yea. You can go one small step further by supporting `nix flake check` (for example) by wrapping the...
Could we have more than one `pkgs` as a result? For, eg., native `pkgs` and a rosetta `pkgs` (on aarch64-darwin).
> A default value for `systems` might be a good idea [..] It gets you halfway there without adding to the learning curve. Agreed, I think that's a good idea....
> Interesting project btw. It would be interesting to turn the template into a reusable module. That way you could achieve a new level of user-friendliness, if you capture the...
I mainly meant 2. -------- Original Message -------- On Mar. 26, 2021, 1:15 p.m., Sascha Tandel wrote: > Unsure what you mean: > > - auto completion within brackets? –...