Sheehan Anderson

@gvenzl @Djelibeybi - Any updates as to whether this may be merged at some point in the future?

Cool. Like I said, expect bumps, but it will be good to get testing in place.

@tuand27613 is this a dupe of issue #756?

@muralisrini or @jeffgarratt - I figure you are the most familiar with the FSM. Could you take a look?

@manish-sethi could you please investigate

Could you include your chaincode or test case? I just checked the existing test case at https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/blob/master/bddtests/chaincode/go/table/table.go#L268 and did not see the same failure. Thanks.

I have created PR #1833 to fix the nil pointer panic. @adecaro The root problem is that there is an error decrypting the data when confidentiality is enabled. I found...

Could you also send me your core.yaml so I can see what settings you have enabled? Also, if you try again with the latest master and PR #1833 it will...

I haven't heard anyone else complain besides me. I still think it looks funny, but I see @muralisrini's point of view that it may come in handy once instances are...

I think it should stay with the asset management chaincode. I'll try to figure out how to make the UTXO chaincode test case not break. That's the only reason we...