Martin Donath

@strausmann that is our priority. It will definitely work offline (our prototype already does), but we'll also add interesting new features like search federation (merging search indexes with other MkDocs...

Thanks for sharing your setup – that sounds like a perfect test case once we have a prototype. If you like, you can subscribe to #5230 and give it a...

__1st search preview is ready in #6321__ – We encourage you to try it on your project and give feedback in #6321 ☺️ > [!NOTE] > It's still the same...

__2nd search preview is ready in https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/pull/6372__ – We encourage you to try it on your project and give feedback in https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/pull/6372 ☺️ > [!NOTE] > > It's still the...

@Aruelius could you share some links to SSGs that support better Chinese search than Material for MkDocs? We're very interested in improving support, and checking some existing solutions is always...

FWIW, a quick search surfaced that Vitepress supports two search providers: - [Local search](https://vitepress.dev/reference/default-theme-search#local-search), implemented using [minisearch](https://github.com/lucaong/minisearch), which [does not support Chinese](https://github.com/lucaong/minisearch/issues/201) - [Algolia search](https://vitepress.dev/reference/default-theme-search#algolia-search) which is a hosted solution...

... and FlexSearch is better? Could you please share concrete examples (ideally with minimal reproductions) that allow me to thoroughly understand what you find to work better in FlexSearch than...

Thanks for the clarification! Would it help if you could do infix search? In essence, if you could not only search for prefixes, but for any character contained in `支持中文搜索​`?...

Thanks for sharing! It's safe to say that we will account for this use case as well ☺️

Thanks! Definitely interesting, but likely not possible in the browser alongside documentation that is shipped to users. 38MB download (as mentioned in the linked issue) is a no-no, but we...