Pasquale Congiusti
Pasquale Congiusti
We must reopen this because it turned out the change would be a breaking compatibility one. More details in #5516.
Waiting for some feedback before closing this.
Closing as waiting for feedback. Please, reopen if still facing any issue.
cc @gansheer
I think this can be closed, right @gansheer ?
No. I'm updating this and leaving open for next milestone.
@rinaldodev thanks for reporting. What labels do you think it is required? Please also let me know if you are going to work on this so I can assign to...
@rinaldodev are you planning to work on this for next 2.4 release? Should I add it to the milestone?
Thanks for reporting. I have the vague feeling this is kind of unsupported scenario. When we create the native build, what we do is creating a "native" Deployment which attempts...
Thanks for the details. Then, it seems that the operator behavior is correct as it applies the changes to the KSVC custom resource as it is expected. The only additional...