Pasquale Congiusti
Pasquale Congiusti
@parul5sahoo are you still working on this? If not, I will remove the assignment, so that anybody else interested can work on it.
No problem, thanks for letting me know.
@phantomjinx @tadayosi @oscerd @astefanutti please, use this issue to add any repeated failure you may experience (I mean, anything that use to happen ofter enough to be considered really flaky).
--- FAIL: TestKameletChange (269.36s) will be fixed by #3256
Yes, the latest merges (ie, 821ef90a5175a998df971e19a25f9526fc01ef3b) are not reporting any error.
I don't have a strong opinion on this matter. I think you have done a great analysis work, so, I'll trust your findings.
I had a look at this and I don't think it's a bug but the way it is designed the system so far (we may understand if it makes sense...
I think this can be closed. Any leftover by any chance?
Thanks @dhirajsb. I see this parameter is belonging to `ConnectorTemplate` and it is different that `Connector.id`. I wasn't either able to find a way to relate the `ConnectorTemplate` to `Connector`,...
We're moving the runtime to 1.14.0 in #3561 is this still a valid PR or will be supersede by that one?