Maxime Labelle

You can emulate this combining the `contains()` function with a `not-expression`: `` search( [? !contains(@, `2`)][], [[1, 3, 5], [2, 4, 6], [1, 2, 3]]) -> [1, 3, 5] ``

Yes, it definitely [should be explained better]( https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/95).

@chris-armstrong I just realize that you started the same effort. Although I have started to cherry-pick various fixes and enhancements to my fork, should we use your fork instead ?...

> @springcomp can you describe the organisation that is backing you? I believe you are working on this on behalf of an employer @innovate-invent I will be involved from a...

> I believe the goal was to separate the website code base and issues from the core specification. This new repository would need to include all the necessary documentation for...

> Right, are you planning on forking https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.jep into your organisation? Or did you have a different direction planned? I think one repository for both the spec and its proposals...

> Would you want to keep the repo as a fork so that the issues remain with the original? I think we would have to break the fork relationship to...

Dear community, @jdevillard and myself have now setup the various forks required for ensuring the future of JMESPath. A [JMESPath Site](https://jmespath-unofficial.github.io/jmespath.site/) fork has been setup. It is clearly marked as...

> Would you be interested in listing off specific tasks that you have planned/need done? I and others would be more likely to pick away at them if we knew...

Dear all, I have made what I think is good progress curating some content and backlog that could be candidate for the next release of a specification. - I have...