Mathew Heard

I think if a rule builder is a good idea it should have some advantage over using the regular interface. Perhaps that it doesnt rely on `.Parse`. Building soimething however...

Yes an unsupported option to masqerade you can add. Acceptable PRs accepted.

Thank you for your work on this patch, it works quite well and is VERY interesting.

Sure thing :) Yes I agree it would be much better merged into the base package.

Also myget package is out of date it appears

Ive got a similar issue: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users/splitice/Documents/KiCad/6.0/scripting\plugins\viastitching\viastitching_dialog.py", line 456, in onProcessAction self.FillupArea() File "C:\Users/splitice/Documents/KiCad/6.0/scripting\plugins\viastitching\viastitching_dialog.py", line 368, in FillupArea if self.area.HitTestFilledArea(layer, p, 0): File "C:\Program...

+1 If this was licenced as MIT couldn't it just be copied (along with any other useful functions?)?

Perhaps someone who understands bleno can work out the behavioural difference? Ive never used bleno but the change has a huge positive impact on noble (devices actually can be connected...

Honestly I think someone needs to nut this out on the bleno side. There is no documentation on either the original workaround or the new. It could well be that...

We had our team meeting today, if someone on the bleno side can work out which element of the patch causes problems (or useful information) we will integrate and test...