multi-monitors-add-on
multi-monitors-add-on copied to clipboard
Does not work on GNOME version 42.0
The extension in incompatible with the GNOME version shipped with Ubuntu 22.04 (version 42.0).
stateAdjustment is undefined
Hi, I have the next menssage erro:
The settings of extension multi-monitors-add-on@spin83 had an error:
Error: No property margin on Gjs_multi-monitors-add-on_spin83_prefs_MultiMonitorsPrefsWidget
Stack trace:
_init/Gtk.Widget.prototype._init@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/overrides/Gtk.js:55:50
_init@/home/titoff/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/multi-monitors-add-on@spin83/prefs.js:52:15
MultiMonitorsPrefsWidget@/home/titoff/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/multi-monitors-add-on@spin83/prefs.js:50:1
buildPrefsWidget@/home/titoff/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/multi-monitors-add-on@spin83/prefs.js:275:18
_init@resource:///org/gnome/Shell/Extensions/js/extensionPrefsDialog.js:32:44
ExtensionPrefsDialog@resource:///org/gnome/Shell/Extensions/js/extensionPrefsDialog.js:10:4
OpenExtensionPrefsAsync/<@resource:///org/gnome/Shell/Extensions/js/extensionsService.js:129:33
asyncCallback@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/overrides/Gio.js:115:22
run@resource:///org/gnome/Shell/Extensions/js/dbusService.js:186:20
main@resource:///org/gnome/Shell/Extensions/js/main.js:22:13
run@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/script/package.js:206:19
start@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/script/package.js:190:8
@/usr/share/gnome-shell/org.gnome.Shell.Extensions:1:17
Can everyone help please???
regards
Good luck with that, seems abandoned. Last commit was 1.5 years ago. Or did I miss something?
Can anyone takes the responsibility then?
Great idea! How about you? :+1:
Maybe just fork by someone with knowledge? i was using this plugin, but iam not JS dev
I use https://github.com/realh/multi-monitors-add-on
I use https://github.com/realh/multi-monitors-add-on
sadly this release doesn't work for me on gnome 42.9 throwing same problem than mentioned above https://github.com/spin83/multi-monitors-add-on/issues/169#issuecomment-1200594977