Santiago Pericas-Geertsen

@jim-krueger Do we have now a better understanding as to whether this deprecation (w/alternative) is feasible for 3.2? Still not clear to me that it is.

@jim-krueger Understood. I'd like to better understand who we plan to handle resource method invocations in the new and the old (and backward compatible) styles, as well as how to...

@jansupol Is this related to the proposal to evaluate multiple applications in 4.0? Is that what you mean by "shared CDI"?

@jansupol In an app server environment, shouldn't applications be completely isolated to each other? Isn't this typically accomplished using independent CLs? Maybe I'm just not understanding the "shared CDI" use...

@jim-krueger I can take this one

@pestapever Would you like to provide a PR?

Duplicate of #6397

Quick summary of required changes are as follows (for more information see [Metrics 5.1 Changes](https://download.eclipse.org/microprofile/microprofile-metrics-5.1.0/microprofile-metrics-spec-5.1.0.html#release_notes_5_1)): - New method in `Snapshot` - Our `ProducerTest` fails likely due to changes in `@RegistryScope`...

WIP is here https://github.com/spericas/helidon/tree/issue-8004

Setting milestone to 4.1.0 for this one