Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
> `@DefaultValue`'s `value` string actually is just the _input_ to the converter in case the request did not contain the parameter according to that paragraph. Right. This could be done...
As I stated in the PR, @Inject and @Context have different targets. @Inject cannot be used for params and @Context cannot be used in constructors. A very popular use case...
@chkal You're right, in thinking about using @Inject at method level (as it cannot be used at param level), I was thinking about @Context and @*Param together. Clearly, @*Param is...
Seems that we may have digressed into 3.0 discussions (which is great, but likely for another issue). This issue is about deprecating annotations in 2.2 and potentially providing a transition...
@arjantijms I understand that deprecation does not change semantics. However, it does result in annoying warning messages which would be tolerable if the version _after_ 2.2 would only require replacing...
@arjantijms Yes, there are indeed solutions, but those that are backward compatible aren't very elegant IMO (not just because of additional conventions, but also for the use of ContextResolver's as...
Hi Ryan, Section 11.2.8 of the JAX-RS spec states that constructor injection is OPTIONAL with CDI (and other beans). It recommends the use of field injection and @PostConstruct for portability....
Christian, I would need to dig up that discussion to be certain, but I suspect it is related to the usual problem of combining DI systems. JAX-RS constructors much support...
> On Jul 9, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Arjan Tijms wrote: > > I would need to dig up that discussion to be certain, but I suspect it is related...