Santiago Pericas-Geertsen

@oliviercailloux I'm all for clarifications. Are you interested in providing a PR that includes clarification text about SSL? It can be Javadoc, spec or both.

@NicoNes Issue #736 is long and difficult. Would you care to summarize here the final set of _rules_ via examples that combine the various entity methods? I know this is...

I understand that this PR is in essence a "clarification". However, given its breadth, should we push it into 3.1 at this stage? I suspect that if we write some...

> @spericas sure you're right a summary will help. I should be more careful what I ask for ;) > > Here it is, it is a bit long but...

@NicoNes I have set the target to 4.0 (tentatively) until I hear from others. As I said above, this is sort of a _broad_ clarification that is probably better for...

@NicoNes Would you be interested in creating a PR targeted to the `release-4.0` branch for this?

@jim-krueger That would be much preferable to excluding them in my view, but I'm not sure this is allowed by the rules. Can anyone confirm this either way?

@ivargrimstad Could we make the change described here without excluding the test? That is, get an exception as @arjantijms suggested.

> From the JAX-RS 3.0 specification (chapter 3.7.2, step 2b) > > > We write 𝑛1/𝑚1;q=𝑣1;qs=𝑣′1;d=𝑣″1≥𝑛2/𝑚2;q=𝑣2;qs=𝑣′2;d=𝑣″2 if one of these ordered conditions holds: > > i. 𝑛1/𝑚1≻𝑛2/𝑚2 where the partial...

> > I'll continue with the `text/plain;format=flowed` example, though my own need for this actually comes from the `profile` parameter with `application/hal+json` (as well as the `profile` parameter on `application/ld+json`)....