Santiago Pericas-Geertsen

> I'm coming around on this idea. I'm wondering if we want to also add a `bufferContent` method similar to `Response#bufferEntity`. I have mixed feelings about this one. It just...

@jimma @andymc12 @jansupol Given where we are in the release process, I'd suggest we revisit this post 3.1.

Remaining backward compatible is _definitely not a goal_ for 4.0. In fact, we have been trying to better align with CDI for a long time. Keeping support for `@Context` and...

Closing given that it was never approved

@rmannibucau I'm sorry but I cannot disagree more with your assessment of MP. In my view, Jakarta EE is the one at risk here if it continues to rely on...

CDI was fairly new and "unproven" at the time and it did not support SE in the early days. JAX-RS had other requirements that were difficult to achieve with a...

> The reason JAX-RS does not use CDI is because making it easy to run with another IoC always had been a goal which also led to creating the JAX-RS...

@mkarg Not yet. Feel free to assign it to you if you want.

Any volunteers to do this?

Closing as it was never approved