Santiago Pericas-Geertsen

@derekm We need someone to submit a PR :)

@derekm Not everyone agrees on the _all or nothing approach_; if a middle ground will not cut it, we might just as well move on ...

@derekm No, you submit the PR with the proposal and update it based on the feedback received and until you get the necessary approvals. If I recall correctly, last time...

@jeyvison Seems like there is some interest in your PR. If you re-submit, I'll take a closer look and provide a review. Let's give it another shot. Thanks.

Closing after not getting the necessary approvals.

@jamezp It would be injectable as a normal CDI bean without the need to use `@Context`. Any CDI bean shall be injectable in param position on a resource method, in...

We should adopt the CDI rules assuming we turn Application subclasses into proper beans.

Redefining `@Context` as a qualifier isn't going to make the new Jakarta REST compatible. There are other significant differences (resource method parameters, context resolvers, entity params, etc.) that have been...

@rmannibucau On the topic of scanning, absolutely, CDI scanning should be part of the SE proposal.

> @jansupol Thanks for the input again. > > > Now the discussion seems to be about a better return type or better convenient method. In your example, you use...