speckle-sharp
speckle-sharp copied to clipboard
specklesystems
.NET SDK, Schema and Connectors: Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Dynamo, ETABS, AutoCAD, Civil3D & more.
Requested in https://speckle.community/t/new-settings-page-feature-for-desktop-ui-2-test/2365/3 Transforming the geometry without providing the project origin makes it difficult to later federate models. Adding these would make it easier to re-locate the models as necessary.
Recently had a few contributors ask general questions for best practices when submitting prs to open source projects. Update our `CONTRIBUTING.md` to include more detailed steps about forked repo management...
Let's support hot-swappable kits in DUI!! I'm planning some quick improvements for 3rd party developers to be able to create Kits faster, but that doesn't make sense until we allow...
Opening this after our conversation during standup to not loose track of it If we are to finally allow Kits to be a thing, it would be nice to provide...
As different BIM (and CAD) software use and handle types in completely different ways we need to explore a solution that would allow users to set custom "mappings" between the...
See: https://speckle.community/t/ifc-to-revit-family/2919 I've debugged the stream and found two issues: - the material is coming through without a name - @JR-Morgan not sure if we can enforce this or should...
Currently we have 3 types of Roofs in the object model, but only one of them actually works as expected in Revit (RevitFootprintRoof). Also, the object model doesn't reflect all...
See: https://speckle.community/t/revit-connector-levels-and-spaces/2824/3
It seems like the logic to handle transports other than Server is missing in the receive node. Ref: https://speckle.community/t/dynamo-transport-nodes/2816/4
Metadata
Owner
Metadata
.NET SDK, Schema and Connectors: Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Dynamo, ETABS, AutoCAD, Civil3D & more.