Fix badges in the README
It is more balanced now :)
Before:
After:
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
Documentation
- Updated DeepWiki badge formatting in documentation for improved rendering and consistency.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
| Project | Deployment | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| robyn | Nov 3, 2025 5:22am |
Walkthrough
The pull request replaces the DeepWiki badge in README.md, converting it from an HTML anchor tag to a Markdown image/link syntax. This is a documentation-only change with no impact on runtime behavior or application logic.
Changes
| Cohort / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Badge Syntax Update README.md |
Swapped DeepWiki badge from HTML anchor tag to Markdown image/link format |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
- Verify the Markdown syntax is correct and renders properly
- Ensure the badge link still points to the correct destination
Poem
🐰 A badge gets dressed in Markdown's new clothes,
HTML tags fade as simplicity grows,
No logic disrupted, just prettier display—
The README shines bright on this fine refactor day! ✨
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description Check | ⚠️ Warning | The pull request description is largely incomplete and fails to follow the required repository template. The provided description consists only of before/after screenshots with a casual comment ("It is more balanced now :)") and entirely omits the required sections including the "## Description" with issue reference, the "## Summary" section explaining what the PR does, the PR Checklist, and Pre-Commit Instructions section. This lacks the professional documentation expected for pull request submissions. | Please update the pull request description to follow the required template structure. Add a proper Description section referencing any related issue, a Summary section explaining the changes and their purpose, complete the PR Checklist by checking off applicable items, and confirm Pre-Commit Instructions were followed. |
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title Check | ✅ Passed | The title "Fix badges in the README" accurately refers to the primary changes in the pull request, which involve updating badges in the README file. While the title could be more specific about the exact nature of the change (converting a badge from HTML to Markdown format), it clearly and concisely communicates what was modified and is specific enough for teammates to understand the core purpose without being misleading or overly vague. |
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- [ ] Create PR with unit tests
- [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40a8bd115f890e86b850c323b1738532bf577fc3 and b6676df293006b67889563fe0774ca474f52644c.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
-
README.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
10-10: Badge syntax looks good.The DeepWiki badge is correctly formatted as a Markdown image/link and matches the structure of adjacent badges (lines 5–9, 12–14). URLs are valid and the syntax is clean.
Since the PR focuses on visual balance improvements, I'd recommend verifying the rendered appearance in a Markdown preview or on GitHub to confirm the layout change achieves the intended balance. The code itself looks solid.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
Love it