qt: Fix building with gcc14 for [email protected]

[draenog]

Fix building [email protected] with gcc@14

[spackbot-app[bot]]

Hi @draenog! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:

• qt

Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class:

    maintainers("draenog")

If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with spack blame:

$ spack blame qt

Thank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent.

You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer.

[wdconinc]

While you're at it, can you also rebase the branch to pick up more recent CI checks.

[haampie]

Hi @draenog, this package-related pull request can be migrated from spack/spack to spack/spack-packages using the migrate-pkg-prs utility.

We encourage authors to run the migration script themselves to preserve author attribution.

You can migrate all your open pull requests at once, following the steps in the documentation.

---

This comment was posted automatically.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last 6 months. It will be closed in 30 days if there is no further activity.

If the pull request is waiting for a reply from reviewers, feel free to ping them as a reminder. If it is waiting and has no assigned reviewer, feel free to ping @spack/spack-releasers or simply leave a comment saying this should not be marked stale. This will reset the pull request's stale state.

To get more eyes on your pull request, you can post a link in the #pull-requests channel of the Spack Slack. Thank you for your contributions!