Florian Best

icon indicating a website link https://www.wechall.net/profile/space

icon company @Univention GmbH icon location Bremen, Germany icon location Open Source Software Enginner at @univention. Especially interested in HTTP (@httpwg), REST, Security technology, @python and Clean-Code.

Results 263 comments of Florian Best

Possible B020 false positive with instance attribute

Introducing another code for this would be helpful (or just ignoring) IMHO.

Don't read /proc/$PID/maps for core files

Same problem hiere: ``` (gdb) heap Python Exception [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/proc/4951/maps': Error occurred in Python command: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/proc/4951/maps' ```

Add fuzzy tests

https://www.golem.de/news/open-source-google-fuzzing-fuer-python-freigegeben-2012-152653.html

WIP: Migrate circuits.web HTTP components to `httoop`

All tests are passing :-)

Migrate circuits.web HTTP parser to httoop

@prologic @Osso @kromg @justingiorgi @apollo13 Do you have opinions about this? I am so far at a state where all tests are passing. I can still do some more refactoring...

Migrate circuits.web HTTP parser to httoop

OK, I understand this also as not having a veto against the change.

allow coroutines with Python 3 syntax as async def functions

Relevant documentation is here: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1100188/210219431-7e46ec6a-3dc7-4515-bc0e-656a3eea3553.png) https://docs.python.org/3.7/glossary.html https://docs.python.org/3.7/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines https://docs.python.org/3.7/reference/compound_stmts.html#coroutines We have to make some design decisions. Do we want to support backwards compatibility with `yield`? Should every `@handler` be a async...

Reject messages with multiple single-value headers

http-core issue 193

Human-friendly rule names

I use the prefix categories heavily, as in `pycodestyle`'s `E` they are logically related. E.g. I am doing a tab-to-spaces migration by just selecting `E1` (in `autopep8`). Also I can...

Support RFC 8707

> first to check if anybody else is interested I am interested!