sovdee

> In that case should it become `assert isNaN(clamp(1, 0, NaN value)) is true with "(single ints) min < value < NaN"`? Or do we want it to be false....

Do we still want to move ahead with this now that the function is fixed? I like having the `clamped above/below` syntax.

You are trying to push an entity towards itself, resulting in a vector with a length of 0, which causes infinite components due to division by 0. This will obviously...

> And lastly is there any way to possible make the syntax look like less of a mess? `(holder[s]|viewers|[amount of] rows|([amount of] slots|inventory size)) of %inventories%` > > This issue...

> why is `three` broadcasted second and not in the third placement? Is it a Set? skript sorts by indices. "three" comes before "two"

For the books: I like this addition. I think its optional nature makes it easy to opt out of if you don't want to use it, but provides good tools...

Closing in favour of #6562

Issues found with entries and commands, please hold off on reviews

> Just marking this so that I remember to review it soon one day my prince will come

I'm strongly against adding multiple conditions in one line. However, as a substitute, perhaps the following? ``` if any: a b or/and if all: b c then: d ```