Søren Malling
Søren Malling
I dislike this solution. Seems like we are adding a setting to routing configuration, that should not exist. Reading the original thread, it looks like we are solving a issue...
> A welcome side effect of adding a configuration also is that it makes the need to be aware of the caching transparent to developers. Totally disagree. It clutters the...
@simstern Can you attached the fully created proxy class here? Need to ensure that the `use` statements in the top is there :)
For reference, this is a extension of the functionality created for tags https://github.com/neos/neos-development-collection/pull/3451
> Isn't the `master` branch supposed to be readonly by now (so this should target `8.1` instead) ? – well, or probably `9.0` even since this is a breaking change?...
Will you be so kind and update the resource management documentation part and add a paragraph about the new stream wrapper: Neos.Flow/Documentation/TheDefinitiveGuide/PartIII/ResourceManagement.rst
@mficzel will you be so awesome and add a reference to a issue?
Is this Neos or Flow relevant? I can't seem to reproduce it from ./flow package:create from a Flow-only project
@dkd-kaehm - [x] Tabs in backend modules have no functionality
I find this as a issue worth giving some thought. The relevant code is here https://github.com/neos/flow-development-collection/blob/master/Neos.Utility.ObjectHandling/Classes/ObjectAccess.php#L168 And also seems to try and be kept in some sort of sync here...