correct 6100 t0-64 test ports for xon case

[XuChen-MSFT]

Description of PR

Summary: Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

• [x] Bug fix
• [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
• [ ] Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

• [ ] 201911
• [ ] 202012
• [ ] 202205
• [x] 202305
• [x] 202311

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

xon case failed on 6100 for t0-64 topology

RCA:

original test port ids are as below:

dst_port_id=6;
dst_port_2_id=8;
dst_port_3_id=9;
src_port_id=7;

but the three dst ports belong different pipe, as below:

admin@str3-s6100-acs-6:~$ bcmcmd "show pmap"  | grep -E "xe8 |xe9 |xe6 |xe7 "
             pipe   logical  physical    idb mmu   ucast_Qbase/Numq  mcast_Qbase/Numq  half-pipe
       xe8      1    44        53        20  74       100/10               100/10          0
       xe9      1    45        55        22  75       110/10               110/10          0
       xe6      2    68        65         0 128         0/10                 0/10          0
       xe7      2    69        67         2 129        10/10                10/10          0

So it caused xon test failure.

How did you do it?

reference other 6100 topology, we choose below test ports:

            src_port_ids: [22]
            dst_port_ids: [52,53,54]

and all dst ports are in the same pipe.

admin@str3-s6100-acs-6:~$ bcmcmd "show pmap"  | grep -E "xe52|xe53|xe54|xe22|pipe"
             pipe   logical  physical    idb mmu   ucast_Qbase/Numq  mcast_Qbase/Numq  half-pipe
      xe52      0     1         1         0   0         0/10                 0/10          0
      xe53      0     2         3         2   1        10/10                10/10          0
      xe54      0     3         5         4   2        20/10                20/10          0
      xe22      1    48        61        28  78       140/10               140/10          0

additional, to avoid break other "th" platform's test, copy content of "topo-any" to "topo-t0-64", and just set above recommended test ports into "topo-t0-64" section which is only used by 6100 T0.

How did you verify/test it?

pass local full qos sai test, on 6100 for t0-64 topology:

test plan 66177b7ce3f0ed9b4960f1e7

qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testParameter[single_asic] PASSED       [  0%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXoffLimit[single_asic-xoff_1] PASSED [  1%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXoffLimit[single_asic-xoff_2] PASSED [  2%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXoffLimit[single_asic-xoff_3] SKIPPED [  3%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXoffLimit[single_asic-xoff_4] SKIPPED [  3%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testPfcStormWithSharedHeadroomOccupancy[single_asic-xon_1] SKIPPED [  4%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testPfcStormWithSharedHeadroomOccupancy[single_asic-xon_2] SKIPPED [  5%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testPfcStormWithSharedHeadroomOccupancy[single_asic-xon_3] SKIPPED [  6%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testPfcStormWithSharedHeadroomOccupancy[single_asic-xon_4] SKIPPED [  6%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXonLimit[single_asic-xon_1] PASSED [  7%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXonLimit[single_asic-xon_2] PASSED [  8%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXonLimit[single_asic-xon_3] SKIPPED [  9%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPfcXonLimit[single_asic-xon_4] SKIPPED [  9%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLosslessVoq[single_asic-lossless_voq_1] SKIPPED [ 10%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLosslessVoq[single_asic-lossless_voq_2] SKIPPED [ 11%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLosslessVoq[single_asic-lossless_voq_3] SKIPPED [ 12%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLosslessVoq[single_asic-lossless_voq_4] SKIPPED [ 12%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiHeadroomPoolSize[single_asic] PASSED [ 13%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSharedReservationSize[single_asic-shared_res_size_1] SKIPPED [ 14%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSharedReservationSize[single_asic-shared_res_size_2] SKIPPED [ 15%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiHeadroomPoolWatermark[single_asic] PASSED [ 15%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiBufferPoolWatermark[single_asic-wm_buf_pool_lossless] SKIPPED [ 16%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiBufferPoolWatermark[single_asic-wm_buf_pool_lossy] SKIPPED [ 17%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLossyQueue[single_asic] PASSED [ 18%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLossyQueueVoq[single_asic-lossy_queue_voq_1] SKIPPED [ 18%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLossyQueueVoq[single_asic-lossy_queue_voq_2] SKIPPED [ 19%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDscpQueueMapping[single_asic] PASSED [ 20%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSeparatedDscpQueueMapping[single_asic-downstream] SKIPPED [ 21%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSeparatedDscpQueueMapping[single_asic-upstream] SKIPPED [ 21%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDot1pQueueMapping[single_asic] SKIPPED [ 22%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDot1pPgMapping[single_asic] SKIPPED [ 23%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDwrr[single_asic] PASSED      [ 24%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPgSharedWatermark[single_asic-wm_pg_shared_lossless] PASSED [ 25%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPgSharedWatermark[single_asic-wm_pg_shared_lossy] PASSED [ 25%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPgHeadroomWatermark[single_asic] PASSED [ 26%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiPGDrop[single_asic] SKIPPED   [ 27%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiQSharedWatermark[single_asic-wm_q_shared_lossless] PASSED [ 28%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiQSharedWatermark[single_asic-wm_q_shared_lossy] PASSED [ 28%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDscpToPgMapping[single_asic] SKIPPED [ 29%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSeparatedDscpToPgMapping[single_asic-downstream] SKIPPED [ 30%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiSeparatedDscpToPgMapping[single_asic-upstream] SKIPPED [ 31%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiDwrrWeightChange[single_asic] PASSED [ 31%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiQWatermarkAllPorts[single_asic-wm_q_wm_all_ports] SKIPPED [ 32%]
qos/test_qos_sai.py::TestQosSai::testQosSaiLossyQueueVoqMultiSrc[single_asic] SKIPPED [ 33%]


========== 16 passed, 116 skipped, 14 warnings in 3694.26s (1:01:34) ===========

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

[StormLiangMS]

hi @neethajohn could you help to take a look?

[mssonicbld]

Cherry-pick PR to 202305: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/12534

[mssonicbld]

Cherry-pick PR to 202311: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/12535