FAQ: update ldd information

[rofl0r]

according to what was recently discussed in #musl.

[rofl0r]

A script that like is prone to invoking whatever is in the interpreter field...

Jun 04 04:24:45 <dalias> [02:21:41] a proper ldd should get the PT_INTERP from the binary then execute it with --list

[ericonr]

Yes, i disagree with dalias's suggestion. It only matters for a multilib/multiarch system, and even then, I'd rather be told that a given binary is not what I expected. It opens up too much for little gain.

[ericonr]

Also I think squashing the commits would be nice.

[rofl0r]

Also I think squashing the commits would be nice.

certainly. i was just about to hit the "squash and merge" button, but to my surprise it isn't enabled for this repo. do you have admin rights to change that ?

[ericonr]

<dalias> it's literally just exec /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 --list "$@"
<dalias> the gratuitously complicted one is trying to support multiple archs from one script
<dalias> rather than just hardcoding the right pathname

[ericonr]

I don't think I have the privileges, no. Squashing locally with git leads to a cleaner commit message too...

[ericonr]

And rebase makes for a more linear git history, which is all this really needs.