Jerry Wiltse

We have not added conanfile to our solutions, although I think I could get that approved here. On the other hand, I know I could not have gotten that approved...

Follow existing logic seems good. Is it same process for CMakeSettings.json?

thanks for the feedback, good to know. we might allocate budget for it when we get closer to release.

I have the same opinion on these features as I gave regarding remotes here: https://github.com/bincrafters/conan-vs-extension/issues/22#issuecomment-472441372

Chocolatey is a nuget repo with specific support in appveyor. I will register the account on Chocolatey today and setup deployment.

I’ve used that plugin. Again, by supporting the official format/spec, We can share the list/spec of conan commands between the Cmake native integration and this plugin for working with vs...

After reviewing it again, I recall that another major deficiency was that it seemed to have no concept of the context with which it was being run. I don't handles...

On second look, I'm not actually able to find any examples of any of these files referencing any Visual Studio variables. I see lots of references using their macro syntax...

Ok, so this issue is still valid. In the world of `CMake` integration, the `CMakeSettings.json` effectively defines all the normal visual studio variables, so there's no other "Visual Studio" variables...

I don’t object, but seems a low priority for such a small project.