Interpolation problems in `Bitter[wght].ttf`

[behdad]

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Bitter[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph .notdef was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=500.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in '', [4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 5, 6, 8, 7, 9] in 'wght=500.0'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 5 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 6 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 9 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
  Masters: 'wght=550.0', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in 'wght=550.0', [4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 5, 6, 8, 7, 9] in 'wght=900.0'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 5 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 6 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 9 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.