authorization-panel
authorization-panel copied to clipboard
solid
Github repository for the Solid Authorization Panel
Creating this as a standalone initiative proposal from #72 so that it can be tracked individually. The UCR work should help to inform the scope, priority, and mission of this...
Break-out discussion from https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/issues/79: We're thinking we need VC and that leads us to HttpSig and all of that is a big change, upsetting big parts of the system. So...
Use case 2.7.1 [Only Trust Certain Issuers of Identity](https://deploy-preview-152--authorization-panel.netlify.app/authorization-ucr/#uc-trustedissuers) is listed under Limitations of the UCR. I want to show how we can extend [Web Access Control](https://github.com/solid/web-access-control-spec) to make these...
Use Case [§2.5.1 Limiting access to trusted applications](https://deploy-preview-152--authorization-panel.netlify.app/authorization-ucr/#uc-applications) is part of §2.5 Permission applications, which is listed in [§4 Limitations of Web Access Control](https://deploy-preview-152--authorization-panel.netlify.app/authorization-ucr/#uc-applications). The use case is quite complicated....
re basic resource access: https://solid.github.io/authorization-panel/authorization-ucr/#uc-basic In the Solid ecosystem, wouldn't it more likely - possibly encouraged - to have a "recommendation" scenario where Danielle shares their recommendation from their own...
It's not too uncommon that apps or developers corrupt ACLs. To mitigate this it would be nice if Pod owners can reset or roll back ACLs to an uncorrupted state....
On the [Wedn 27 Teleconf](https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/pull/161/files?short_path=8d9dcf3#diff-8d9dcf3462ed7759d0387a5b631e9c1cf02543d6d7a6db093d76f733cdc8be39) I brought up the importance of us keeping track of efficiency in our protocols, that takes into account how HyperApps work. These are very different...
There are a number of very interesting papers from 2008 on on a form of Access Control called RelBac. This was developed and illustrated with reference to the Semantic Desktop...
ACP defines a class of Rules, to describe types of agents. But what are those? The [current ontology](https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/blob/731965e1aa9fef8a23eaece31d6b1e8f2e75e4e5/proposals/acp/solid-acp.ttl) defines it as: ```Turtle acp:Rule a rdfs:Class ; rdfs:label "Rule"@en ; rdfs:comment...
Having determined that `acp:access` is the inverse of `wac:accessTo` in [issue 129: acp/wac diff the ACR document](https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/issues/128), I end up with the mapping between wac and acp ```Turtle wac:accessTo owl:inverseOf...