Solar Designer

The kernel is 5.14.0-162.6.1.el9_1.0.1.x86_64. Yes, "#256 looks like some JUMP_LABEL-like related features were backported which we don't handle right", however that only helped expose that frequent triggering of the integrity...

> by running for a minute In my testing, one minute was not enough to fully trigger the problem - a few minutes were needed. Anyway, from what you show...

The listing in https://kernel.ubuntu.com/mainline/daily/ does in fact end with `2024-09-16` right now, and the `current` directory has that same date. So the questions are whether this is intentional by Ubuntu...

Thank you for investigating this @vt-alt! I think let's wait and see what happens e.g. when 6.12 is released.

Are these hashes already in use? If not yet, you could want to take the same approach as with GOST (see gost-yescrypt here), not the same as with SHA-crypt (which...

Hashes like this (not sure if 100% compatible or not) were also used (among many others) in KoreLogic's annual Crack Me If You Can contest this summer. Support for them...

Thanks. I don't remember this stuff well enough to comment without reviewing the code first. By `ciphertext`, do you mean the `char *source` argument?

CC: @martinjungblut @pkopylov from related issues here for possible review/comments. Thanks!

Thank you @pkopylov! > an overflow in the original check_overflow() function might also happen for 64-bit architecture. There was a multiplication of three 32-bit values. So: (2^32)_(2^32)_(2^32) = 2^(32+32+32) =...

Thank you @pkopylov and @sysstat. I think this commit fixed #402, so I've just closed that issue. However, I still would like the original topic of this issue addressed (the...