Simon Hengel

@Mikolaj When I implemented support for response files I tested it with @mpickering's branch. I assume that we are fine.

Anyway, I double checked again, everything seems fine.

> @mpickering I am merely reviving #8718, so I lack the knowledge for the best approach. The use of this key `ghc` is explained at [this comment](https://github.com/sol/doctest/issues/396#issuecomment-1410584365). And: > >...

I think the cleanest solution would be to add a command-line option `--with-repl` so that you can invoke `doctest` with ``` $ cabal repl --with-repl=doctest ``` instead of ``` $...

> > Perhaps a more principled way is to look at the `LibDir` variable and look in `../bin` for ghc-pkg? > > @mpickering looks a better option 👍 I'm definitely...

> @wismill I imagine in 9.2 the path is `$libdir/bin` and in 9.4 the path is `$libdir/../bin`. Depending on whether you want the wrapper script or the binary it is:...

@moodmosaic that's all that I have on my wish list. After that, I'm pretty happy with the output.

https://github.com/hedgehogqa/haskell-hedgehog/pull/519#issuecomment-2105614330 @ChickenProp we could still include the "shrink path", I guess. From what I understand, this only affects performance. Do you regularly run into situations where this makes a practical...

> I did notice that the shrink path is also visible at the top of the failure message, so there's that too. It's gone now, see screens, but we could...

@ChickenProp we will keep the shrink path for now #531. The long-term plan is to add more options to Hspec to allow you to get the full reproduce message and...