Doug Tangren

Linking to [java impl](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/blob/7b1e5b87b0bf03456df9e77716b14731adf9a7a7/aws-java-sdk-dynamodb/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/services/dynamodbv2/document/internal/QueryPage.java#L57) for reference

Tbs assuming these would be associated consts what would the name casing be. The same as struct fields or transformed `LikeThis`. Also is it too naive to leave these as...

Basically anywhere you'd type out the name of a field already declared in Item type struct as a str I'd like to remove human error and give ide's the declared...

Also don't want this to feel to heavy. I don't want this to feel like an orm but more of a static type mapping over existing interfaces

> I'm happy to give this a try some time next week, if you are not in a hurry with this feature. Go for it. Mentioned about were the handful...

I like where you're going with this. What would be the suggested migration path for those already using a string attribute type for their keys?

> Perhaps is can be implemented using a cargo feature where users can opt in to using the legacy string representation. That's an excellent idea. Would you be up for...

I'd imagine the way to do this if someone wants to pick this up is with a cargo feature flag defaulting to the current format

Thanks! You are off to a great start already. That's where I would be looking. Ideally we'd want to do with this with a cargo feature flag with the default...

The feature can be implemented inside the `Attribute` impl for `Uuid` since it's the one place uuids are serialized and deserialized to dynamodb attribute values for any given application so...