Joe Moon

I tried downgrading leiningen, with different but similar results: ``` $ lein -v Leiningen 2.4.1 on Java 1.8.0_25 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM $ lein clean; lein deps; lein ring...

my workaround is to just use `lein uberjar` with a `core.clj` file like this: ``` clj (ns app.core (:gen-class) (:require [ring.adapter.jetty :as jetty])) (defn handler [request] {:status 200 :headers {"Content-Type"...

yeah, i thought that was a little weird, too, but I'm a clojure and jvm n00b

i don't think there's really anything stopping us from being able to do this. You'd just need a `Validation` around both fields, and a selector that applies to both. You'd...

need #357

consensus: remove this check

not really sure i understand this. This means you want to be able to dynamically reorder the column chooser elements? I can't think of a reason that would be useful

would you want a `className` field in the row to be applied to the row?

this might not be an issue, actually. Looks like when we merge `props`, we use `safeMerge()`: https://github.com/appnexus/lucid/blob/master/src/util/state-management.js#L105 Which checks if the prop `isUndefined` rather than `isNull`. It might even make...

this came up again in https://github.com/appnexus/lucid/blob/master/src/util/component-types.js#L76 and https://github.com/appnexus/lucid/blob/master/src/util/component-types.js#L62 I think we should take a more careful look at all the utilities to make sure we're using `isUndefined` or `has`