Sodiray comments

Results 78 comments of


                                            Sodiray

[FEATURE REQUEST] .shakeDeep

Very interesting, I can see the value for sure. I would be down to either create another function and call it `shakeDeep` or add _deep_ as an argument to the...

feat(async): async functions in `parallel` are now called with additional item index and queue index arguments

Hey @UnKnoWn-Consortium thanks for the PR 🙏 and sorry for the delay 🙃 This is interesting, I'm just not sure it's going to be very helpful. My concern is that...

feat(async): async functions in `parallel` are now called with additional item index and queue index arguments

@UnKnoWn-Consortium My concern is that it feels a little like we're exposing an internal implementation detail that users won't understand unless they look at the code. If an index is...

feat(async): async functions in `parallel` are now called with additional item index and queue index arguments

@UnKnoWn-Consortium you think `queueIndex` is still useful if you have the individual index?

feat(async): async functions in `parallel` are now called with additional item index and queue index arguments

> albeit being way less elegant and way more bloated stop, I'm blushing > The former refers to the position of the item that is being processed in the original...

Add correct handling of non string, number or symbol values to unique

Hey @jordydhoker thanks for the PR 👍 I'm curious what your use case is? I'm not sure the ability to use non-primitive values as identifies is worth using a map....

feat: add option to run parallel in order

@Fjandin thanks for the PR 🙏 It's possible I'm missing something but isn't executing the functions in order make it the opposite of executing them in parallel? Could you just...

feat: add option to run parallel in order

On second look at the PR I see, they're still parallel but in order... still a bit confused tho. I'm curious, what's your use case?