Hannes Dorfmann
Hannes Dorfmann
Maybe we should add another Presenter for MVI that comes closer to the idea what Jake Wharton presented here: http://jakewharton.com/the-state-of-managing-state-with-rxjava/ The idea is to have an `Input / Output Presenter`...
``` 05-08 16:19:15.739 2754-2754/com.hannesdorfmann.mosby3.sample.mvi E/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main io.reactivex.exceptions.OnErrorNotImplementedException at io.reactivex.internal.functions.Functions$14.accept(Functions.java:229) at io.reactivex.internal.functions.Functions$14.accept(Functions.java:226) at io.reactivex.internal.observers.LambdaObserver.onError(LambdaObserver.java:72) at io.reactivex.internal.observers.LambdaObserver.onNext(LambdaObserver.java:62) at io.reactivex.internal.util.NotificationLite.accept(NotificationLite.java:246) at io.reactivex.subjects.BehaviorSubject$BehaviorDisposable.test(BehaviorSubject.java:490) at io.reactivex.subjects.BehaviorSubject$BehaviorDisposable.emitFirst(BehaviorSubject.java:451) at io.reactivex.subjects.BehaviorSubject.subscribeActual(BehaviorSubject.java:153) at io.reactivex.Observable.subscribe(Observable.java:10700) at io.reactivex.Observable.subscribe(Observable.java:10686) at...
Either fix Scopes in `MailAppModule` or use `@Subcomponent`. Remove static fields from `MailAppModule` which is the current workaround.
Finish the MVI sample
MVP sample is not fully implemented yet
As reported in #44 parsing an xml like ``` xml Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday ``` is not possible with `@PropertyElement` nor with `@Element List` directly. The current...
As you all have noticed TikXML is not in a good shape anymore. This has various reasons but the main reason probably is that I'm not working for Tickaroo anymore...
Since we have switched to gradle the `annotation` artifact somehow doesn't get published
`DelegatingTypeAdapter` has already replaced with a purely generated (annotation processing) `TypeAdapter`. There are some Unit tests using `DelegatingTypeAdapter`, but really just for convenience reasoning (and / or to test `DelegatingTypeAdapter`...
If there is just one single attribute we don't have to allocate an extra `HashMap`. In this case we can just use a simple `if statement`