snipe-it
snipe-it copied to clipboard
snipe
Feature Request: Checkout accessories to assets
Server (please complete the following information):
- snipe-it version: 5.X
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. We have some keyboards and mice that are located on a shared desk. If I would checkout them to a special user, it would be wrong because these are not the accessories personally added to him.
Describe the solution you'd like I would like to checkout accessories to users and assets.
Describe alternatives you've considered If I would change the keyboards and mice type to components, it would be possible to check them out properly. But components cannot be linked to users. So we have another problem.
Additional context We could add keyboards and mice as components and accessories, but this would be a bad set up. If you like this feature and would accept a feature request for this, I could help to implement this.
Could this be extended to follow the same checkout system that Assets have (checkout to User / Asset / Location) and also apply this to components?
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
![stale[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1724?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Running out of ways to tell this bot that issues are still relevant only two months later...
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
We really need this. We have kits that contain Assets and Accessories. Without being able to check out the accessory to the asset, we cannot account for them correctly.
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Yes, unless this feature has been implemented, it is still unresolved. Please do not close this.On Feb 13, 2020 9:32 PM, "stale[bot]" [email protected] wrote:Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Yes, this had not been implemented yetOn Apr 14, 2020 1:54 AM, "stale[bot]" [email protected] wrote: Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Unless the feature has been implemented, it is still relevantOn Jun 13, 2020 8:17 AM, "stale[bot]" [email protected] wrote: Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Is this still relevant? We haven't heard from anyone in a bit. If so, please comment with any updates or additional detail. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Don't take it personally, we just need to keep a handle on things. Thank you for your contributions!
Okay, it looks like this issue or feature request might still be important. We'll re-open it for now. Thank you for letting us know!
Definetely a nice feature. We need to reorganize our assets and would go for accesories. Do you have a database table cheat? I see, that assets and accesories are different tables.
This would be an awesome addition: checkout accessories to asset/user/location.
Same here. We would like to checkout an accessories to locations. Our use-case: We want to add desks as accessories. Those belong to a location and should be checked out to those. But same applies to keyboards in out meeting rooms. These accessories should be checked out to a location as well. Thanks
