snibgo

> Can you point me to the IM source code, so I can have a look there as well? On this page, click on "Code" at top-left. Reading and writing...

> So it looks to me that the images are really different. We expect them to be different, as one has unassociated alpha and the other has associated alpha.

Thanks for solving this, and telling us about your solution, @coeing. I don't know why "`-channel R,G,B`" solves the problem. Incidentally, the commas shouldn't be needed, this should be equivalent...

Try: ``` convert -background None bug_example.svg bug_example.png ``` Does that cure the problem?

This is the result I get with IM v6.9.12-72 (using `convert`) and 7.1.1-20 (using `magick`). ``` convert -background None MSVG:sq3.svg x6.png ``` All squares are red. The centre square has...

IM's MSVG and Inkscape are interpreting the SVG differently. I suspect that Inkscape is correct and MSVG is not correct. But the OP wants the MSVG version. Ideally, the SVG...

> Well, I just want the converted image to look as similar to the original image as possible. I understand. But your "original image" is actually an RGB image converted...

> If I understand it correctly, IM is using a guessed profile even now. Otherwise, it won't be able to convert the image, right? No. If your command doesn't include...

> ... and then IM should be able to reproduce them in the output even if no colorspace/profile of the output is specified. But IM doesn't know if you want...

> Here's the problem/question: how can the filesize increase that way? I know, we have quality=100% but i can't believe this is the only cause. Your input image is a...