Jonny Saunders

genuine question here - so the list of lists implementation is for a zero-additional-deps version, but the more I think about it the less sense it makes, are we thinking...

Ping on this q, im gonna work on the nptyping version today. Thinking about what we want re: extensibility, we will want to provide hooks to a bunch of different...

I am working on this now and i don't think we'll be able to do List of List implementation with pydantic 1 with validation - bumping request for pydantic 1...

Sorry a few different things here as i've been working: https://github.com/linkml/linkml/issues/1925 is a proposal to set a deprecation timeline for V1 generally to allow for downstream migration if anyone depends...

OK Here's the first complete (i think?) draft of all combinations of array specifications with pydantic 1. like I said it is NOT PRETTY and also I have yet to...

Planning on continuing this today :) I think we can keep this going, i'll merge in main and finish the last bits re: injecting the generated classes. The purpose of...

Totally, yes of course. and that's another thing I hope that having target-domain models will help with! def agreed on "as close as possible without extra restrictions"

here's a fun one - for the list of lists implementation, if we are assuming numpy won't be present, then we also can't really handle if it _is_ present all...

([rod serling voice](https://youtu.be/yeiz66uDBUA)): submitted for your approval an implementation of the List of List arrays with a first round of tests for all the types of arrays that the specification...

last TODO here is docs, this is ready for review :)