Ryan Barrett

> For bridging AT to AP I had assumed that an opt out system would work similarly to bird.makeup where the AP account for the user would only be created...

Thanks for the vote of confidence @pcottle! I'm definitely partial to that perspective on AP federation and bridges too. And we're excited for Threads integration! Following up on instance level...

> @snarfed thoughts on making a post on bluesky to solicit opinions? Maybe posting from the bridgy fed account + soliciting reposts? Yes! Definitely the right idea. I'll admit that...

Thanks guys! This has been a common request for a while now, eg https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/discussions/1347#discussioncomment-11216096, #1517, etc. I've generally been reluctant because Bluesky profiles are only 256 chars, so space there...

Shipped a first pass at this:  

~~Hah, sorry, Bridgy's log UI is not great, it's not giving you the right log there. Looks like your site doesn't like webmentions to https://singpolyma.net/actionstream/reply-https-bsky-app-profile-14/ , it's returning 400s:~~ ...sorry,...

Ugh yeah, this is a longstanding bug/stale cache issue on Bluesky's end, their PDS entryway isn't great at serving the `resolveHandle` API call we use. Not sure what to do...

They claimed to have fixed this a while ago. Tentatively closing.

Thanks for filing this, and for the details and examples! And for finding #1002, that is indeed useful background. The bad news is, this is unlikely. It may often be...

Good point! Maybe the 80% solution here, eg just break at whitespace like how we truncate now, is reasonable after all.