snapd
snapd copied to clipboard
snapcore
many: fix iface static attrs not properly updating
Similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1825883 (content) and https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1942266 (system-files), custom-device, shared-memory, and posix-mq (edit: and more! mount-control, snapd-control, dbus, pretty much any hardware interface, and probably others all may have static attrs) interfaces don't properly update on refresh if the static attributes change. This MR addresses that, and attempts to create a more general solution than the previous approach.
Most of the delta here is just tweaking existing interfaces to inherit from commonInterface, as that was just as easy as defining a new member function for each of the interfaces that doesn't inherit from commonInterface (and maybe will be helpful in the future)
Codecov Report
Merging #12878 (24656fb) into master (81ce92a) will increase coverage by
0.09%. Report is 154 commits behind head on master. The diff coverage is70.00%.
:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the GitHub App Integration for your organization. Read more.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12878 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.69% 78.79% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 1000 1011 +11
Lines 124254 125701 +1447
==========================================
+ Hits 97779 99041 +1262
- Misses 20321 20446 +125
- Partials 6154 6214 +60
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 78.79% <70.00%> (+0.09%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Files Changed | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| overlord/ifacestate/helpers.go | 74.53% <69.81%> (-0.55%) |
:arrow_down: |
| overlord/ifacestate/handlers.go | 62.92% <71.42%> (-0.14%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 73 files with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
There is a test failure in spread that looks real and I can reproduce it locally:
$ spread -debug -v qemu-nested:ubuntu-16.04-64:tests/main/interface-update-on-refresh
...
+ echo 'and ensure the snap service is still active'
and ensure the snap service is still active
+ tests.systemd wait-for-service -n 30 --state active snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service
tests.systemd: service snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service did not become active
qemu-nested:ubuntu-16.04-64 .../tests/main/upgrade-from-2.15# journalctl -u snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service|tail
Sep 06 13:48:25 autopkgtest go-example-webserver.webserver[20514]: listen tcp :8081: socket: permission denied
Sep 06 13:48:25 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Sep 06 13:48:25 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Unit entered failed state.
Sep 06 13:48:25 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
qemu-nested:ubuntu-16.04-64 .../tests/main/upgrade-from-2.15# snap connections
Interface Plug Slot Notes
network go-example-webserver:network :network -
network-bind go-example-webserver:network-bind :network-bind -
qemu-nested:ubuntu-16.04-64 .../tests/main/upgrade-from-2.15# grep '# Description: Can access the network as a server' /var/lib/snapd/apparmor/profiles/snap.go-example-webserver.webserver
# Description: Can access the network as a server.
# Description: Can access the network as a server.
...
I'm still investigating
I'm able to reproduce this on my workstation. Recording my observations here:
- it appears to be race-y, as I've both observed this failure and observed it succeed on my local machine
- on at least my latest run, I get a different set of logs than @mvo5:
qemu:ubuntu-16.04-64 /var/lib/snapd/apparmor/profiles# journalctl -u snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service|tail
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: Started Service for snap application go-example-webserver.webserver.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=11/SEGV
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Unit entered failed state.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Failed with result 'signal'.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Service hold-off time over, scheduling restart.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: Stopped Service for snap application go-example-webserver.webserver.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Start request repeated too quickly.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: Failed to start Service for snap application go-example-webserver.webserver.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Unit entered failed state.
Sep 06 11:37:58 autopkgtest systemd[1]: snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'.
it also appears to be failing in different places for me and for @mvo5. Mine fails after using snapd 2.15 to install go-example-webserver, before migrating to the latest snapd deb.
+ snap install go-example-webserver
907.85 KB / 1.77 MB 50.21 % 643.06 KB/s 1sservices
go-example-webserver (stable) 16.04-9 from 'canonical' installed
++ uname -r
+ [[ 4.4.0-210-generic != 4.4.* ]]
+ tests.systemd wait-for-service -n 30 --state active snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service
tests.systemd: service snap.go-example-webserver.webserver.service did not become active
I'm also seeing lots of
[Wed Sep 6 11:00:47 2023] audit: type=1400 audit(1694012447.778:34): apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" profile="snap.go-example-webserver.webserver" name="/usr/lib/snapd/snap-exec" pid=3956 comm="snap-exec" requested_mask="m" denied_mask="m" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Not sure if that is related.
Dove back into this (cc @Meulengracht for when you get to it, no rush) and the salient thing here is that when run locally with a qemu backend, I get the same failure (as recorded above) with this branch and with master, which makes me think that there is some additional failure with my local run that is masking anything the test might actually be showing.
If I comment out the if [[ "$(uname -r)" != 4.4.* ]]; then and fi lines then it passes in both cases. Don't know enough about what this is actually doing/working around to know what this might mean.
Of course, with the google backend, the failure is different.
@Meulengracht is this ready for landing?
We need to verify that test pass. This needs to be rebased again probably and then verify test-failures
