Malik Shahzad Muzaffar
Malik Shahzad Muzaffar
I would suggest that - post a message [here](https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/cms-development-nodes-cmsdev-migration-to-el8/36963/2) about the migration of cmsdev23/24. - Disabled login access to cmsdev23/24 on Monday monring at 9h00. Make sure no one is...
We will now decommission `cmsdev23` and `cmsdev24 (alias cmsdev34)` today. These has been replaced by `cmsdev43 and cmsdev44` last week.
`cmsdev30 and cmsdev25` have been migrated to new AlmaLinux8 based `cmsdev40 and cmsdev45` nodes. Migration of `CentOS7` to `AlmaLinux8` for `cmsdev` nodes has been completed. We will decommission `cmsdev30 and...
`cmsdev30 and cmsdev25` has been decommissioned now.
another one in https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/40317#issuecomment-1352433774
@Dr15Jones , we need to wait for newer IB. PR tests here are picking up https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/44354 for an IB which has old ONNXRuntime. Last night's 23h IB is still in...
please test with cms-sw/cmssw-config#104 for el9_amd64_gcc12 lets test it for available arch
please test with https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw-config/pull/104
> @smuzaffar Just to clarify, are the scram-side changes already in? I.e. this PR can safely be merged? yes, scram side changes are alreay in.
test parameters: - pull_request = cms-sw/cmsdist#9042