pylockfile icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
pylockfile copied to clipboard

timeout=0 bugfix not on pypi

Open pettazz opened this issue 11 years ago • 11 comments

It appears that the code for the current version on pypi is 0.9.1 and does not contain the bug fix for timeout=0. Can we get that updated?

pettazz avatar Jan 22 '14 07:01 pettazz

I've asked a number of times in a couple different venues looking fire someone to take over thus project. Would you like to? On Jan 22, 2014 1:02 AM, "Nick Pettazzoni" [email protected] wrote:

It appears that the code for the current version on pypi is 0.9.1 and does not contain the bug fix for timeout=0. Can we get that updated?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/smontanaro/pylockfile/issues/9 .

smontanaro avatar Jan 22 '14 11:01 smontanaro

Sure why not?

pettazz avatar Jan 22 '14 16:01 pettazz

Good. What do I need to do? Do you have a PyPI login? I'll work with those folks to hand management of that record off to you as well.

Skip

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Nick Pettazzoni [email protected]:

Sure why not?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/smontanaro/pylockfile/issues/9#issuecomment-33041056 .

smontanaro avatar Jan 22 '14 16:01 smontanaro

Not entirely sure. My pypi username is pettazz. Mind sending me an email so we can discuss?

pettazz avatar Jan 22 '14 17:01 pettazz

Not entirely sure. My pypi username is pettazz. Mind sending me an email so we can discuss?

Sure, though I don't know your email. You can mail me at [email protected] or [email protected] to start up the dialog.

Skip

smontanaro avatar Jan 22 '14 17:01 smontanaro

Note that the commit 58c3832d4b99cc33218c2d7af04a54272602b511 has the same bug as before, effectively doing this:

>>> timeout = 0
>>> timeout = timeout is not None and timeout or None
>>> timeout
>>> timeout is None
True

I've added a fix for this as part of #10

gdub avatar Apr 22 '14 08:04 gdub

@pettazz @smontanaro have you guys managed to move the maintainership thing forward? downstream packagers like to have a stable upstream with blessed tarballs. :)

roman-neuhauser avatar Apr 24 '14 10:04 roman-neuhauser

@pettazz @smontanaro have you guys managed to move the maintainership thing forward? downstream packagers like to have a stable upstream with blessed tarballs. :)

Nope. Nobody has stepped up. I might have more time in the next month to work on it.

smontanaro avatar Apr 24 '14 10:04 smontanaro

@smontanaro cool. ITMT, do you still have old tarballs that used to be in googlecode somewhere? any chance of restoring the old download urls?

curiously, the 0.9.1 tarball in pypi has a different checksum from the one that used to be in googlecode...

roman-neuhauser avatar Apr 24 '14 11:04 roman-neuhauser

Hey there @smontanaro; if you need somebody to help out with this, I'm willing to lend a hand.

coddingtonbear avatar Oct 18 '14 06:10 coddingtonbear

pylockfile is no longer developed at this location.

It has been moved to:

https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/pylockfile/

If the fix is not in that repo, I'm sure they wouldn't mind the help. :)

ethanfurman avatar Oct 18 '14 06:10 ethanfurman