Spencer Smith

@J1aM1ng this meeting is aimed at the summer research assistants, but it would likely be useful for you to attend as well.

@balacij you are correct. I just fixed the title. Our other meeting #3714 is at 3 pm.

We concluded this meeting and covered all agenda items.

I wondered if this was correctly classified as a newcomers issue, until I read the detailed description. Sounds good. :smile:

Thank you for the information and the link @cd155. There are also additional complications @samm82. I'm not sure how the mistake got in there, but the output of IM1 and...

Yes, @cd155 that explanation makes sense. The output, in the output file, being called theta confused me. Calling it theta_1 would be better. :smile: Eventually we'll get Drasil to understand...

Yes @cd155, the output should be the displacement angle as a function of time.

Yes, the table should use the term of the quantity itself, not the IM for the description. The source column with the IM is a good idea.

@samm82 is there still confusion on the output for single and double pendulum? That is, has the original purpose of the issue been satisfied so that we can close the...

@samm82, I wonder if the fix you wish to make is simpler than you think? I don't think our integration of IMs and the generated code is that far along....