Peter Smith

Thanks for the confirmation. Merging.

Apologies for the delay, I was out of office Thursday/Friday and wanted to discuss some possible options on the Monday call. I'll write something up based on the discussion tomorrow...

Apologies, it looks like I'm not going to get this out this morning, still working on it.

Apologies for the length of the post, it could probably do with more revisions and research but I thought it better to send what I have and refine later after...

Thanks for creating the issue. I expect the place to document this would be in https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/sysvabi64/sysvabi64.rst#941gnu-c-library-ifunc-interface I think @nsz-arm would likely be the best person to discuss this and the...

Thanks for letting me know. I've found https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/[email protected]/ (upstream review) for glibc. If there's a public bionic link that would be great. I can update the description in the sysvabi...

From the perspective of just the sysvabi64 document I'd like to write down what the minimal requirements are for the PLT sequences. I think that the two extreme approaches are:...

I don't think the PDF creation is to do with this pull-request as I didn't add the directory to the generate-pdfs script and the same attribute error happens in other...

Thanks for raising the issue. I've started a discussion internally. There looks to be some precedent for using `__arch64_` as a prefix for runtime functions as compiler-rt already has `__aarch64_sme_accessible(void)`...

Will need to have a check with some colleagues on the impact of making the change. I'm more worried about the impact on binary scanners (something like BOLT, or the...