Steven van Beelen

Thanks for filing this issue @OLibutzki, I'll ensure we'll discuss this in our up coming meeting.

Without going into details on the issue, I feel obliged to state the following. We have not been able to discuss this due to more pressing issue from our part...

Interesting idea @jangalinski, worth discussing I'd say. From a prioritization stand point to be honest I don't think this will end on the backlog very high for the time being....

Removed the milestone for now, as we will not be able to resolve this issue within release 4.6.0. We will adjust this ticket accordingly once we pick it up again.

Closing this issue, as pull request #2423 resolves it.

Do you mind elaborating what providing support for Quarkus would entail for Axon, @tunovic? I can likely fill in some blanks myself, but I'd prefer to hear somebodies take on...

> Would Axon think about it or not at all ? I can assure you, we're definitely still thinking about this, @nicolas-vivot. It's more a matter of resources on this...

Thanks for bringing this at our attention. I have heard that quartz was slumbering, but didn't check the repo's for any activity in recent times to be honest. We are...

Thanks for the suggestion @srnm, looks interesting! We'll debate the suggestion as soon as this issue is picked up. :+1:

Currently, this issue has been partially resolved through pull request #1383. The mentioned PR provides an `EventScheduler` implementation which uses Axon Server to schedule events. The `DeadlineManager` alternative, for which...