Simon McVittie

@dennismayr, if you are not seeing the message "Could not unmount revokefs-fuse filesystem", then your issue is something different, and if you believe it is a Flatpak bug then it...

I think "Could not unmount revokefs-fuse filesystem" often indicates a missing or broken `fusermount` or `fusermount3` program. Does the Fedora 35 packaging for flatpak pull in the necessary packages to...

> fusermount: too many FUSE filesystems mounted; mount_max=N can be set in /etc/fuse.conf I suspect this might be the root cause for @krillin666's version of this issue.

> I suppose the description is now obsolete since libglnx MR is merged? Yes, PR now updated to use the merged version.

This is https://github.com/flathub/cc.nift.nsm/issues/3 [edit: and also nifty-site-manager/nsm-flatpak#1] and is unlikely to be fixed by a change in Flatpak. The correct change to resolve this would be for either: `cc.nift.nsm` to...

If this happens again (I don't know why it's intermittent...), it might be useful for someone to find the `cc.nift.nsm` component in `/var/lib/flatpak/appstream/flathub/` and check exactly what XML it is...

> I got the same error's when i used yay to update Arch This will likely happen to anyone whose OS has at least the same level of Appstream and...

We do not need additional reports of this. It will affect basically everyone, and commenting to say "me too" does not help it to be resolved. The way to resolve...

> Can't the app at least be removed from Flathub until this is resolved? Yes it could, but only by the maintainers of Flathub (a source of Flatpak apps), and...

> Linux version 5.15.68.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 Problems with `/dev/shm` on WSL2 are #4484, not this issue. This issue is about ordinary non-WSL Linux systems running on hardware, using sysvinit as init system....