smcoll

Results 35 issues of smcoll

If the inline is collapsed by default (`extra=0`), `prepopulated_fields` doesn't have an effect. But it works properly if at least one inline is shown when the page is loaded.

Solid work on this package, by the way.

## Type of issue [REQUIRED] bug ## Uploader type [REQUIRED] S3 ## Bug details [DELETE EVERYTHING IN THIS SECTION IF THIS IS A FEATURE REQUEST] ### Fine Uploader version [REQUIRED]...

bug
to fix
2 - Do
S3

My app watches for data changes, and then schedules a singleton task for cache regeneration. The singleton is very helpful, because i'm not queueing the same task multiple times if...

File: [docs/reference/pkg/aws/lb/targetgroupattachment.md](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/reference/pkg/aws/lb/targetgroupattachment/) The Python code for [**Usage with Lambda**](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/reference/pkg/aws/lb/targetgroupattachment/#usage-with-lambda) results in an exception: > Exception: 'depends_on' was passed a value that was not a Resource. i believe changing the `depends_on`...

docs/autogenerated
kind/bug

While testing, Django's `override_settings` decorator doesn't update `extensions_api_settings` since by that time, it's already been initialized. `django-rest-swagger` solves that problem by listening to the `setting_changed` signal: https://github.com/marcgibbons/django-rest-swagger/blob/master/rest_framework_swagger/settings.py

If an event is created with a recurrence rule but no 'end_recurring_period', Event._occurrences_after_generator() will throw a TypeError (can't compare datetime.datetime to NoneType) on this line: ``` if o_start > self.end_recurring_period:...

bug

A quick way to see this bug is to install and view the sample project (which uses America/Chicago as the TIME_ZONE). On the Day view (/schedule/calendar/daily/example/) the day starts at...

bug

i'm working on splitting a project into two, using stack dependencies, and stuck on a TargetGroupAttachment which doesn't seem to want to import. ``` $ pulumi up [...] Diagnostics: aws:lb:TargetGroupAttachment...

kind/enhancement
area/providers
area/import

I used a `SOFT_DELETE` policy on a "through" model for a `ManyToManyField`. When i delete the relationship, the related object is still appearing via the related manager. ``` # models.py...