Amberdata adapter - Response different from documentation

[aelmanaa]

Hello,

I've tried the following amberdata adapter and noticed that the response is different from what's documented on README file but also different from Ambderdata doc

Request

curl --data '{"id": "1", "data": {"endpoint": "crypto",  "base":"ETH", "quote":"BTC" }}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" -X POST https://<amberdata-adapter-endpoint>

Response

{"jobRunID":"1","result":0.0741599,"maxAge":90000,"statusCode":200,"data":{"result":0.0741599},"metricsMeta":{"feedId":"ETH/BTC"}}

Expectations

Should contain other fields as well:

{
    "timestamp": ..,
    "pair": "ETH_BTC",
    "price": "0.0741599",
    "volume": "..",
    "vwap": ".."
  }

[austinborn]

Hello, thank you for pointing this out, although I believe the adapter is working as expected. The external adapters will always format its own response to the request, so it may not follow the same schema as the response from the data provider's API. In order to get the underlying fields as part of the response in data, you should be able to run the adapter with API_VERBOSE=true as an environment variable. Can you try that out?

[aelmanaa]

Hello @austinborn

thank you for your answer. Still the response that I got is different from the what's documented in the README examples . I'll try with your suggestion.

I understand when you say that the adapter behaves as expected but does it mean that clients have to rely on result rather than other fields? This could be problematic in some cases like AP Election API where important info can be missed. Here we get "result": "271187,Biden" while the client might be interested to know the full name and the party as well. If this repo is only to raise technical issues then we can close the issue indeed.