#13615

[rishabhRsinghvi]

Requires

Resolves

[ibrajer]

@rishabhRsinghvi Please note that this change goes against the guidelines: https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/develop/contracts/STYLE_GUIDE.md#picking-a-pragma We shouldn't change pragma versions for audited contracts and none of these contracts are customer-facing contracts. Consumer-facing contracts already have loose versioning, for example: VRFConsumerBaseV2Plus Solidity version used in pragma in the public VRF docs is just an example, a customer can set a newer Solidity version if needed.

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.