slsa-verifier icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
slsa-verifier copied to clipboard

Verify provenance from SLSA compliant builders

Results 123 slsa-verifier issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

We don't have tests for these. For GCB, it's particularly important since multiple provenances may be contained in the gcloud provenance.

type:feature
area:tests

When we bump the major version, we need to update the go.mod and all the imports in the file. See https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/issues/299 and https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/pull/378 for context. We may want to add...

area:tooling
area:tests

Is "slsa-verifier" can we use in Azure Devops? if yes can you share the steps.

type:feature

We need to release the Action. TODOs: - [x] Fix checkout I tested (https://github.com/laurentsimon/slsa-on-github-test/blob/main/.github/workflows/verifier-action.yaml#L11): ``` uses: slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/actions/[email protected] ``` and it gave me the following error: ```Error: An error occurred trying...

area:installer
type:task

Currently, we populate the Verify\*Command's properties directly, instead of using CLI flags. I added support for additionally testing CLI flags, but this would only allow us to test the output...

area:e2e
area:cli

For defense in depth, we should verify these against the signing certificate, print these, and also in the future expose options for clients to create policies to verify these against.

type:feature

See original discusssion https://github.com/gossts/slsa-provenance/issues/21

type:feature

We need a better story around installation, like a native debian package. Work items: - [x] File a WNPP ITP bug (https://wiki.debian.org/ITP) Done https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019904 - [ ] Refresh knowledge on...

type:feature
area:tooling

Do we need to start thinking of a SLSA level flag during verification? This could encourage users to use our tool for verification, even when the provenance has lower levels,...

type:discussion